What does the future hold for South Shore Fire Station #212? Jan 5, 2025 – Update #3

Published January 5, 2025

Submitted by Chris Durkee, Task Force Chair – The South Shore Fire Station Task Force (SSFSTF) is continuing to make progress in evaluating
the future of Station #212 on South Shore Blvd. Having already reviewed the existing
deficiencies of the current station and confirmed the need for a fire station in the south/east
quadrant of Lake Oswego, our group set out to determine if the current site of Station #212 is optimum.


Lake Oswego Station #212

Here is a summary of what we’ve accomplished so far:

Reviewed deficiencies of current station 212, which include:

  • Living quarters not built to current “essential facility” seismic standards
  • Apparatus bay too small for current and future equipment
  • Electrical system and emergency power system in poor condition
  • Inadequate separation between living, office, training and workout spaces
  • Bathrooms lack privacy and equitable accommodations

Confirmed need for a fire station in the south/east quadrant of Lake Oswego. Rationale
includes:

  • Without a 4th fire station, response times don’t comply with county standards and significantly reduce chances for positive outcomes on medical and fire calls.
  • South/east quadrant of city could be cut off from the other 3 stations in event of a natural disaster such as flood or earthquake
  • Maintaining 4 stations provides for growth in housing and senior facilities in this portion of town.
  • Minimal savings if station 212 was to be decommissioned – staff would likely be relocated to other stations while phasing out positions through retirement.

A group of people standing around a table

Description automatically generated
Members of the Task Force confer with Lake Oswego firefighter/paramedics stationed at South Shore Station #212.



Established that the current location for Station 212 is optimum, because:

  • Alternative sites along Stafford Rd were studied and shown to result in longer response times for much of 212’s service area.
  • No developable City-owned property in s/e quadrant would yield better response times.
  • To build on an alternate site, the City would have to purchase multiple homes at considerable expense.
  • Acquisition through eminent domain was determined to be highly undesirable.
  • An alternative site (not city-owned) on McVey Ave was evaluated but did not show sufficient improvement in response times to warrant the cost, time, and trust impact of pursuing acquisition.

Meeting #4 of the SSFSTF will be on January 9th , agenda includes:

  • Review of preliminary spatial program prepared by Fire Department staff based on analysis of current and future needs, and information gleaned from touring other facilities
  • Review of preliminary project costs prepared by City staff based on recently constructed fire stations in our area
  • Discuss feasibility of renovation rather than new construction
  • Initial discussion of funding options

Stay tuned – we’ll issue periodic updates on the Task Force’s progress. For more information or to provide input please visit lakeoswego.city/SSFSproject, contact Quin Brunner, LO Management Analyst (qbrunner@lakeoswego.city), or Chris Durkee, Task Force Chair (durkeechris@yahoo.com).

WANT TO GET INVOLVED?

VOLUNTEER OR DONATE

PNA Community
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) Project Coordinator

Primary Role:

  • Handles NEP grant applications, grant approvals, reviews receipts for reimbursement and is the single point of contact between the entire Palisades Neighborhood Association (PNA) and the City.
  • To be successfull in this role you should be organized, communicative.
  • Time commitment: From 8-12 hrs. throughout the year

Process:

  • Accepting NEP proposals: Anyone living in the Palisades Neighborhood Association can submit proposal(s) to the NEP Coordinator along with estimated costs throughout the year. They should follow the application guidelines and answer the questions related to their proposal.
  • PNA Board will Vote on Which Items To Include in our NEP Proposal: During the month of March PNA board meeting the NEP Coordinator asks the board to vote on the proposed item(s). NEP Coordinator encourages person(s) proposing the item(s) to attend the meeting to answer questions that might come up. The PNA board then votes on which items should be included in the NEP grant proposal.
  • Developing and Submitting the NEP Grant Proposalt: During the NEP grant proposal period (usually the month of May) the NEP Project Coordinator:
    • Fills out the NEP grant proposal application based on items approved by the PNA Board;
    • Gets sign offs from the PNA Chair
    • Submits the proposal form to the city in early May for the initial review process
    • Provides additional information requested by the city
    • Revises and submits the final application to the City by the deadline (typically May 31).

What Happens Next:

  • Iris McCaleb from the City forwards the NEP grant proposals to the grant review committee and then to the City Council who review it and awards certain grants.The NEP Coordinator will receive a letter of award from the City and will share it with the PNA Leadership Team.
  • As items are purchased from the approved grant list, the project close-out form is filled out by the person requesting reimbursement. They will attach digital copies of receipts and photos and then submit all to both the NEP Project Coordinator and the PNA Chair. The NEP Project Coordinator submits the reimbursement request to Iris at the City for reimbursement.
  • Reimbursement checks are then sent directly to the person who purchased the item(s).